Verified Supplement Data

Thorne vs Optimum Nutrition Creatine (2026): Same Molecule

By Erin Rose Updated October 20, 2026 Methodology

Buy Optimum Nutrition. It costs $0.30 a day against Thorne’s $0.49, and both are on a list that tests for banned drugs. The difference: NSF tests each Thorne lot before listing it. Pay the extra only if you need NSF.

Better buy

Optimum Nutrition

9.0/10

Cost
$0.30 a day
Testing
Informed Choice
Check price

 

Thorne

8.0/10

Cost
$0.49 a day
Testing
NSF Certified for Sport
Check price

Drug-tested in sport? Buy Thorne. Its NSF Certified for Sport listing names 7 lots, so you can match the lot on your tub. It costs about $69 more a year. How each tub is checked.

If you are not set on these two brands, our pick for most people is Naked Creatine: plain creatine monohydrate on NSF/ANSI 173, which checks the tub holds what the label says. It costs $0.18 a day, less than either (best creatine).

How we checked

5
testing lists searched for each tub
7
Thorne lots NSF names for the 453 g tub, Oct 20
2
labels read in NIH’s label database
4
tubs priced on Amazon, Nov 6

Same creatine, three ways of checking it

Both tubs are on a list that tests for drugs banned in sport. The lists check in different ways. NOW Sports, shown for comparison, is tested every batch before it is sold.

Who checks the tub for banned drugs, and how often

Optimum Nutrition

Informed Choice

Tubs bought from shops, at least monthly

Can you check your tub? Yes. Search the batch number on your tub at Informed Choice. It lists the batches it tested.

Thorne

NSF Certified for Sport

Lot by lot: 7 lots named for the 453 g tub

Can you check your tub? Yes. Match the lot number printed on your tub to the listing. If your lot is not there, NSF has not named it.

NOW Sports

Informed Sport

Every batch, before it is sold

Can you check your tub? No need. Every batch is tested before release.

From each program’s own description and list. NSF Certified for Sport searched October 20, 2026; Informed Choice searched September 22, 2026; Informed Sport searched October 16, 2026.

The two listings, as we saw them

Informed Choice lists the batches it tested for Optimum Nutrition. NSF lists Thorne by lot. Either way, match the number on your tub. Screenshots taken October 8, 2026 (Informed Choice) and October 17, 2026 (NSF); click an image to open the live page.

Every list we searched

We searched each program’s own list for each product. “Listed” means we found the product there.
Testing listOptimum NutritionThorne
NSF Certified for SportNot foundListed
Informed SportNot foundNot found
Informed ChoiceListedNot found
NSF/ANSI 173Not foundListed
USP VerifiedNot foundNot found

NSF/ANSI 173 is not a banned-drug list. It checks that the tub holds what the label says. Thorne is on it too.

What the labels say

Both labels list one ingredient: 5 g of creatine monohydrate a serving, and nothing else. That is the form and dose the research uses (Kreider 2017).

Supplement Facts panel from the Optimum Nutrition label: 5 g serving. Certification mark printed on the Optimum Nutrition label.
Optimum Nutrition · 300 g (10.6 oz), 60 servings Label on file with NIH DSLD 319465, entered December 21, 2024. This is the label for the 300 g / 60-serving tub, the pack we price.
Supplement Facts panel from the Thorne label: 1 scoop (5 g) serving.
Thorne · 16 oz (450 g) tub, 90 scoops Label on file with NIH DSLD 298066, entered September 25, 2023. This is the label for the 90-serving tub, the one we link. NSF lists the same tub as 453 g.

What the price gap costs you

Thorne costs $0.19 more a day than Optimum Nutrition. At 5 g a day, that is about $69 a year.

Amazon prices, checked November 6, 2026. Each label’s serving is 5 g of creatine.
TubPriceA dayA year
Optimum Nutrition, 60 servings$17.97$0.30$109
Thorne, 90 servings$44.00$0.49$178
NOW Sports, 120 servings$19.79$0.16$60
Naked (our pick), 200 servings$35.99$0.18$66

Prices move. To check a tub you see somewhere else, divide its price by its servings. Every creatine we price: creatine prices.

How the two scored

Optimum Nutrition scores 9.0 out of 10 and Thorne 8.0. One mark separates them: cost. Thorne costs more a serving, so it gets 0 of 2 points for cost, and Optimum Nutrition gets 1. They score the same on dose, testing, label and recalls. How we score.

Who should buy which

What the reviews found about creatine itself

Both tubs hold the same creatine monohydrate, so the research applies to either one. Four reviews that pooled many trials:

Questions

Is Thorne creatine better than Optimum Nutrition?

Not for results. Both are creatine monohydrate, 5 g a serving, and nothing else. That is the form the research uses. Thorne’s extra cost buys NSF Certified for Sport, which tests each lot before listing it. That matters if your sport asks for NSF.

Is Optimum Nutrition creatine third-party tested?

Yes. Its Micronized Creatine Powder is on the Informed Choice list, which tests for banned drugs. The Informed Choice mark is printed on the 300 g label.

How much Optimum Nutrition creatine should I take?

One rounded teaspoon a day. Optimum Nutrition’s label calls that 5 g. Thorne’s label lists one scoop (5 g). Loading and timing are in the creatine dosage guide.

Is micronized creatine better than regular creatine?

No. Micronized means the powder is milled finer, so it mixes more easily. A gram holds the same creatine, so the dose stays 5 g. The creatine forms guide covers the other forms.

What we got wrong

Until October 17, 2026, this page said Optimum Nutrition was not certified. That was wrong. It is on the Informed Choice list, which tests for banned drugs, and the mark is printed on its label. Until October 20, 2026, this page said you could not check an Optimum Nutrition tub by batch. That was wrong. Informed Choice lists the batches it tested, and you can search your batch number on its site.

Sources

  1. Kreider RB, et al. International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2017;14:18. The Council for Responsible Nutrition, a supplement trade group, paid to prepare it. PubMed 28615996
  2. Zhang H, et al. Effects of creatine supplementation on muscle strength gains: a meta-analysis and systematic review. PeerJ. 2025;13:e20380. PubMed 41328071
  3. Pashayee-Khamene F, et al. Creatine supplementation protocols with or without training interventions on body composition: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2024;21(1):2380058. Co-author Candow advises Alzchem, a creatine maker. PubMed 39042054
  4. Doma K, et al. The paradoxical effect of creatine monohydrate on muscle damage markers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2022;52(7):1623-1645. PubMed 35218552
  5. Naeini EK, et al. Effect of creatine supplementation on kidney function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2025;26(1):622. PubMed 41199218
  6. NSF Certified for Sport certified products, searched October 20, 2026. Thorne listing 1204244.
  7. Informed Choice certified products, searched September 22, 2026.
  8. Informed Sport certified products, searched October 16, 2026.
  9. NSF/ANSI 173 certified dietary supplements, searched September 28, 2026.
  10. Labels: NIH DSLD 319465 (Optimum Nutrition), NIH DSLD 298066 (Thorne).
  11. Prices: Amazon, checked November 6, 2026. Product photos: Amazon, shown under the Associates program licence.